Bing vs. Google: a small comparison

This is a small comparison between Google and Microsoft's new search engine Bing. I tried to compare most used features for web search and results quality. Quality of image and video search like common services would be the point of next article.
Google's goal is simplicity and experience. Google's huge stats make available to find relation between different search terms. Bing's goal is Curiosity. People want to see what can a Google-competitor search engine do.
A search for a not very popular poet who writes in a not very popular language gives very different results on both engines. Google ranked old sites (mostly non english) higher and Bing ranked popular sites (mostly in english) higher. Not happy! Google's results were not up2date(older is not better always) and Bing's results were not multi-aspect.
A search for "Michael Jackson":
Google finds 120 mio results
Bing finds 108 mio results
Most of results are similar on both search engines.
Google and Bing include local maps, image and video results.
Bing shows search popularity for given string, but when you click on the graphic, MS wants to download & install "Silverlight.exe" without inform you about Silverlight first and ask you if you want to install(typical MS).
Bing shows geoip related results without asking to select your location or language. For example if you are coming from Germany, Bing ranks Germany and german related results higher. But if you are an english speaking person from Germany or just some one who uses a german proxy, there is not a simple -one click- option to change to bing.de or vice versa.
Google's autocomplete engine is better.
Google's suggestion engine is better(Did you mean ...).
Google can search alternatives, misspelled words, singular+plural much better than Bing.
Bing uses more javascript.
Ad placement is similar on both search engines (top + right sidebar)
Bing uses web2 style background images, Google does not use extra images, but different logos.
Bings page navigation is easier to click on.
Bing shows a mouseover text preview with ajax, but action area is hidden, could be better with a zoom or info icon.
Google lists second or multiple results from same domain unter the first one.
Bing lists second or multiple results from same domain as a seperate item.
Bing has no language tools / translation services.
Bing lists top results from categorized related searchs.
Index page(just HTML):
Google : 7kb
Bing : 28kb
Max results per page:
Google: 100
Bing: 50
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| bing-vs-google-logo.png | 10.78 KB |
Similar entries
- Why bloody Bing sends fake referrer?
- Bing search rss feeds needed
- WebSearch
- Redirect a query to multiple search engines with one form and javascript
- Why MSN-Live SE use fake referer?
- Fix Google Adsense Search and Drupal Conflict
- Strange results from Pagerank and Alexa while comparing top-forums
- How to make website popular
- Drupal 6 vs. Joomla 1.5 (2009)
- Best websites for cool free fonts to download
- Search in text files recursively with PHP - Grep
- Cómo hacer que su sitio web popular!
- Most important sites for a webmaster
- Check password strength / safety with PHP and Regex
- Google nervt!
- Next generation URLs, hostname/id without www and long-keywords
- Google's bloody javascript annoying
- How to change 'Welcome to the Frontpage', index-title of Joomla 1.5
- Url manipulation with mod_rewrite and php-catcher for beginners
- When will Wolfram-Alpha be online?












Comments
Even without the UI Google is winner
I had shows random result pages of the first few hits and even without the UI and extra features, Google still wins on the bare results. Here are my results of that experiment http://www.royans.net/rant/2009/06/25/bset-searchengine-relevance-test-r...
Google Stiil Rules though Bing is Just Behind in My book...
Google stiil rules but Bing from the little i've seen is just behind in terms of efficiency and analysis.
Post new comment